Yes it seems even professional wrestlers can engage in some professional public intellectualism.
I just hope he looked like this when he was watching the show where he saw the claims he disagreed with.
Yes it seems even professional wrestlers can engage in some professional public intellectualism.
I just hope he looked like this when he was watching the show where he saw the claims he disagreed with.
This is the final round from the U Mass – Amherst Tournament held last weekend (this debate happened yesterday actually!). The motion is: this House would legislate against embedded journalism.
The teams are:
OG – RIT
OO – Cornell
CG – Hobart & William Smith
CO – St. John’s University
I’ll post a comment in a bit with the final ranking from the judging panel. Nicole Colston is the Chair of this round.
I love public controversies that involve religion and politics in unusual ways.
Here’s one of the semifinal debates from U.Mass. Amherst this past weekend. The motion was This house would establish a DNA database of all citizens for the purposes of criminal investigation (or something close to that).
here are the teams involved:
OG – St. John’s University
OO – Cornell University
CG – University of Vermont
CO – St. John’s University
I’ll post who went through to the finals on the comments so that you can watch it, make up your own mind and see if your decision matched that of the panel. Eric Barnes of Hobart & William Smith Colleges is the Chair of this debate.
Narrowly averted disaster when I somehow lost the driver for my wireless card ? it’s now reinstalled after great frustration and some kindness from Umass students with wireless laptops that work. Too bad the wireless codes dont work for me yet. Still trying! But I will have internet at the hotel later so I’m not sweating it.
Its later now, and all 5 debates are done for the day, but we have 2 break rounds tomorrow. I’m eager to see the draw! More tomorrow for now its time for sleep. I didn’t film the prelims but will definitely film tomorrows last prelim.